Letters to the Editor

CAO: wetlands know no boundaries | Letters

The proposed critical areas ordinance sets forth a system where in order to develop land, a landowner is expected to survey, delineate and, if necessary, remediate a wetland.

However, with buffers as big as 260 feet, It will not be uncommon for a wetland on one parcel to affect the development prospects of a neighboring parcel.

One of the major flaws of the proposed CAO is that it does not specify how a landowner will have access to a critical area in a neighboring parcel in order for it to be surveyed or remediated. Simply, how can landowner on Parcel A demand access to Parcel B in order to survey the wetland in order to complete the requisite study?

This potential problem becomes even more likely when it is considered that the owner of Parcel B may wish to limit the development on Parcel A.

While perhaps a governmental agency could obtain a regulatory warrant to compel a landowner to submit to inspection by that agency, I can think of no law where Landowner A can compel the inspection of Landowner B’s property.

Until this eventuality is addressed, it is clear the proposed ordinance is not ready for approval.

Nicholas Power/San Juan Island

 

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Aug 20 edition online now. Browse the archives.