Letters to the Editor

Prop. 1 — 12 years is the right number | Letters

For both supporters and critics of the Proposition 1 Real Estate ExciseTax, as funding for the Land Bank, the question of the 12-year renewal seems to be an issue of contention.

So, why wouldn't a shorter reauthorization cycle be sufficient?

At the risk of adding my thoughts to the cacophony, I believe the lengthy period is necessary because it allows the Land Bank to maintain its mission and vision for the long term, allows property owners flexibility in their sale or easement decisions, and provides sustainability on current preservation and restoration projects.

These are vital necessities to the future health and welfare of our island and ourselves.

I urge you to vote "Yes" on Prop. 1

Cinda Pierce

Friday Harbor

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jul 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.