Opinion

Critical Area Ordinance: Off track, out of balance | Letters

Under the council’s proposed critical area ordinance, applicants will be required to navigate a complex set of rules and restrictions to get the county’s approval for the use of their land.

Applicants will have to prove they will not “impact” the environment with the “development” they propose on their land and implement expensive “mitigation” of the theoretical impacts.

In the draft ordinance being written by the county’s planning staff the rules are vague, with the “director” being given the final authority to decide on the approval or denial of a citizen’s permit application.

Under the proposed ordinance, the unelected director becomes the most powerful and authoritative person in the permitting process. Let’s hope the county has a director with the wisdom of Solomon — not likely based on recent experience.

When it comes to balancing the CAO with the other normal planning goals, such as housing, the economy, transportation, or the property rights of citizens, only the natural environment is of importance to the majority of the council. Nothing else matters.

There has never been a serious attempt to see how the CAO proposals would play out against the other requirements of the GMA.

As citizens, we should be asking our elected officials to balance and consider all of the interests of the islands’ residents, not just the narrow agendas of a small group of environmentalists.

Joseph Ryan

Roche Harbor

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.